3D Printing for Research Labs: Materials, Tolerances, and What to Prepare

3D Printing for Research Labs — Materials, Tolerances, and What to Prepare

3D printing is now essential in scientific research for:

  • Custom holders & fixtures
  • Sample stages
  • Optical mounts
  • Mask alignment tools
  • Prototypes for vacuum systems
  • Microfluidic molds
  • Device housings
  • Mechanical adapters
  • Temporary jigs for machining or assembly

Research laboratories require higher precision, better materials, and carefully controlled tolerances compared to hobbyist 3D printing.

This guide explains how to choose materials, design parts, and prepare files for successful manufacturing.

SECTION A — 3D Printing Technologies for Research Labs


1. FDM (Fused Deposition Modeling)

Best for large, strong, and inexpensive parts.

Materials:

  • PLA → fast prototyping
  • ABS → better strength + heat resistance
  • PETG → chemical resistant
  • Nylon → high strength, semi-flexible
  • PC (Polycarbonate) → high heat resistance
  • Carbon-fiber reinforced → very strong

Pros:

  • Low cost
  • Large parts possible
  • Strong mechanical properties

Cons:

  • Moderate surface quality
  • Limited fine details
  • Layer lines visible

2. SLA / Resin Printing (Photopolymer)

Best for high detail, microfluidics, and optical alignment components.

Materials:

  • Standard resin
  • Tough resin
  • High-temperature resin
  • Clear optical resin
  • Ceramic-filled resin

Pros:

  • Very high resolution
  • Smooth surface
  • Ideal for complex geometries

Cons:

  • Brittle (depending on resin)
  • Post-curing required

3. SLS (Selective Laser Sintering)

Best for engineering-grade nylon parts.

Materials:

  • Nylon PA12
  • Nylon with glass beads

Pros:

  • No support structures
  • High strength
  • Good for functional prototypes

Cons:

  • More expensive than FDM
  • Slightly grainy texture

4. Metal 3D Printing (SLS / DMLS)

Best for components requiring high strength or vacuum compatibility.

Materials:

  • Stainless steel
  • Aluminum
  • Titanium
  • Inconel

Pros:

  • End-use mechanical parts
  • Vacuum compatible
  • High durability

Cons:

  • Highest cost
  • Requires post-processing

SECTION B — Tolerances for 3D Printed Research Parts

Technology Realistic Tolerance
FDM ±0.20–0.30 mm
SLA Resin ±0.05–0.10 mm
SLS Nylon ±0.10–0.20 mm
Metal SLS ±0.10–0.15 mm

SLA is best for high precision.
Metal SLS is best for structural strength.


SECTION C — Temperature & Vacuum Compatibility

✔ FDM Plastics

Material Max Temp Vacuum Compatibility
PLA ~55°C Poor (outgassing)
ABS ~90°C Moderate
PETG ~75°C Moderate
Nylon ~120°C Good if dried
PC ~140°C Good
CF-Nylon ~150°C Good

✔ SLA Resin

  • Standard resin: 50–60°C
  • High-temp resin: 200°C (short-term)
  • Vacuum: Moderate, must post-cure thoroughly

✔ SLS Nylon

  • Good for moderate vacuum
  • Must be baked/dried to remove moisture

✔ Metal 3D Printing

  • Excellent for vacuum systems
  • Suitable for UHV after polishing and bakeout

SECTION D — What Information Customers Should Prepare Before Ordering

1. Material Selection

Specify:

  • Strength requirement
  • Temperature requirement
  • Chemical exposure
  • Vacuum conditions

2. Tolerances

If not specified → standard tolerance will be used.

Specify:

  • Hole diameter tolerances
  • Fitting tolerance (+0.1 / −0.1 mm)
  • Sliding fits vs interference fits

3. Surface Finish Requirements

Options:

  • Raw print
  • Sanded
  • Polished
  • Resin-cleared (for optical parts)
  • Dye-colored (SLS)

4. Post-Processing

  • Drilling
  • Tapping
  • Inserts (brass heat-set inserts)
  • Machining after printing
  • CNC finishing on critical surfaces

SECTION E — When to Use 3D Printing vs Machining

✔ Use 3D printing when:

  • Complex internal channels
  • Lightweight structures
  • Fast iteration needed
  • Non-critical tolerances
  • Optical alignment jigs
  • Holder, frame, adapter
  • Microfluidic molds (SLA)

✔ Use machining when:

  • Tight tolerances (<0.02 mm)
  • High temperature (>150°C)
  • High vacuum (<10⁻⁶ Torr)
  • High structural load
  • Optical-grade flatness

 

Back to blog