CsI(Tl) Energy Resolution at 662 keV | Full Technical Explanation
Share
What Is the Typical Energy Resolution of CsI(Tl) at 662 keV?
The typical gamma-ray energy resolution of CsI(Tl) at 662 keV (¹³⁷Cs) is:~6% FWHM
(5.5–7.0% depending on crystal size, quality, and electronics)
CsI(Tl) offers a good balance of performance, ruggedness, and cost, making it ideal for portable radiation detectors, spectroscopy instruments, and high-light-yield applications.
Why CsI(Tl) Achieves ~6% Resolution — Physical Explanation
Energy resolution of a scintillator depends on:
- Light yield
- Statistical variation in photon production
- Non-proportionality of light output
- Crystal quality & defect density
- Coupling efficiency to PMT/SiPM
- Electronic noise
CsI(Tl) produces ~54,000 photons/MeV, which is extremely high and comparable to (or better than) NaI(Tl).
However, CsI(Tl) exhibits some non-proportional response at low energies, making its resolution slightly worse than theoretical limits.
Comparison: CsI(Tl) vs Other Scintillators at 662 keV
| Crystal | Energy Resolution @ 662 keV | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| LaBr₃(Ce) | 2.6–3% | Best resolution, expensive |
| NaI(Tl) | 6–7% | Industry standard |
| CsI(Tl) | ~6% | High light yield, rugged |
| LYSO | 8–10% | Fast but lower resolution |
| BGO | 10–15% | Very dense but low light output |
CsI(Tl) is nearly identical to NaI(Tl) in resolution, but:
- mechanically stronger
- less fragile
- slightly hygroscopic (but lower than NaI)
- available in more shapes
Size Dependence — Why Larger Crystals Have Worse Resolution
Resolution becomes worse for large CsI(Tl) crystals due to:
- increased optical scattering
- longer photon paths
- greater absorption
- non-uniform thallium distribution
Typical values:
| CsI(Tl) Crystal Size | Expected Resolution |
|---|---|
| 10×10×10 mm | 5.5–6% |
| 20×20×20 mm | 6–6.5% |
| Ø1" × 1" | 6–7% |
| Ø2" × 2" | 6.5–8% |
Sensor Choice: PMT vs SiPM Matters
PMT-coupled CsI(Tl)
- Best resolution
- Matches CsI(Tl) emission spectrum (~550 nm)
SiPM-coupled CsI(Tl)
- SiPM PDE optimized for ~420–500 nm → not ideal
- Resolution may degrade by 10–20%
- But smaller, low-voltage, portable
So resolution depends on coupling technology:
| Sensor | Resolution Impact |
|---|---|
| PMT | Best (~6%) |
| SiPM | 6.5–8% typical |
Factors That Improve CsI(Tl) Resolution
- High-quality crystal growth (low defects)
- Optimal Tl-doping concentration
- Proper optical polishing
- Good reflector wrapping (PTFE / ESR film)
- Silicone optical coupling
- Low-noise preamplifier
- PMT with good quantum efficiency at 550 nm
Is CsI(Tl) Suitable for High-Resolution Applications?
Yes — but not for ultra-high-resolution nuclear physics.
It is suitable for:
- portable spectrometers
- environmental monitoring
- medical imaging
- industrial inspection
- radiation dosimeters
For best resolution, LaBr₃(Ce) is superior, but CsI(Tl) is dramatically less expensive and far more rugged.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1. What is the energy resolution of CsI(Tl) at 662 keV?
~6% FWHM (typical range 5.5–7%).
Q2. Is CsI(Tl) better than NaI(Tl)?
Resolution is similar; CsI(Tl) is mechanically stronger and more rugged.
Q3. Why do larger CsI(Tl) crystals have worse resolution?
More scattering and absorption → reduced photon collection efficiency.
Q4. Can SiPM improve CsI(Tl) resolution?
SiPM usually slightly worsens resolution compared to PMT.
Q5. What limits CsI(Tl) resolution?
Light yield non-proportionality and optical transport losses.